|
Autopsy
Reports Expose Cruelty of Lethal Injection
February 13,
2006
It's the stuff of nightmares, and the very definition of cruel and unusual punishment: A prisoner remaining aware, but paralyzed and unable to speak, while a deadly, caustic drug flows through his veins.
This could be the
reality of execution in the United
States. Lethal injections, the preferred method of execution in every
state but
Nevada
, use three drugs: sodium thiopental, a surgical anesthetic, followed
by the paralytic drug pancuronium bromide, and finally potassium
chloride, which stops the heart and causes death.
A medical journal's
review of autopsy reports in 49
executions by lethal injection in
Texas
and
Virginia
showed that 43 had critically low levels of anesthetic in their
bloodstreams, and 21 had so little that they were likely conscious
throughout the painful process
of stopping their heart.
This is unwelcome
news to death-penalty supporters, but no surprise to those familiar
with the history of lethal injection. It's a procedure that's
frequently
botched. The American Medical Association and other professional
medical groups condemn capital punishment, so doctors and nurses
usually refuse to participate in executions. That means executions are
often performed by under-trained medical technicians, who often have a
hard time finding a vein. Even in states where trained medical
personnel are involved in executions, it's often to insert intravenous
lines
into veins scarred by drug abuse.
If the drugs aren't
administered properly, the line used to feed them into the prisoner's
body can clog, delaying the execution. Even when everything goes
technically right, things go wrong: When the state of California
executed 76-year-old Clarence Ray Allen
last month, the first dose of drugs wasn't enough to stop his heart.
Florida
's lethal injection process follows that of other states. The only
difference is that
Florida
inmates are offered Valium, a mild tranquilizer, before the execution
starts. It's hard to imagine a pill powerful enough to calm the terror
and agony of feeling veins burning as if acid had been injected into
them.
This isn't the first
time an execution method fell
short. Two gory electrocutions in
Florida
speeded the demise of the electric chair as an execution method
(only
Nevada
now uses it.) Hanging too often resulted
in prolonged deaths, the firing squad is on its way
out in the last two states that use it and the gas
chamber, perhaps the cruelest of methods used in this
country, probably won't be used again in the United
States.
Now lethal injection
is under attack. Two
Florida
executions are now on hold while the U.S. Supreme Court decides whether
the inmates will be able to
challenge lethal injection as cruel and unusual. Clarence Hill, who
murdered a police officer in 1982,
was strapped to a gurney with IV tubes in his arms
when the Supreme Court issued a stay. Arthur
Rutherford, who killed a
Milton
woman in 1985, was
scheduled to die a few days later.
State officials
argue that Hill and Rutherford showed
no mercy to their victims, and deserve none from the state.
Their vision is
skewed. The state should not fight for
the right to sink to the same level as murderers.
The grim reality of
the death penalty is that it's
hard to end the lives of healthy human beings without
torturing them in some way. Even if the death penalty
had been proven to be effective in stopping crime (it
hasn't) or were fairly administered (it isn't), it is
inescapably cruel, reprehensible to any just society.
Source
Back
to Home
|