|
Letter from Antuan Bronshtein - I Need Help!
December 26, 2006 Dear
Reader, To
begin with: my name is Antuan Tony Bronshtein, I've been imprisoned in I
would start by telling you how I was badly framed by overzealous police
and unethical prosecutors but I think you’ll find recent events more
interesting and so I'll start there. On
April 14, 2005, in an opinion that is not only impeachable on its face
but for what it covers up, newly seated Supreme Court Justice Samuel
Alito - then a Third Circuit Court Judge - made me a political prisoner
in Bronshtein vs. Horn, and the following is an accurate account, in a
nutshell, of the lengths many have gone to silence me and those who
would help me ever since. In
July 2005, after I attacked Alito's opinion in Court filings as
politically motivated and warned of going public after discovering it
was also improperly influenced by a founding partner of, the very
influential, and politically connected law firm, Cozen O'Connor - whose
admitted malpractice Alito covered up - I began receiving letters from a
purported "Prison Release Ministry" calling itself "The
Forgiveness Foundation," which was set up a block away from the
White House on 1700 Pennsylvania Ave.
Responding
to my request for help in finding me a good attorney the supposed
executive director Rodney Rexrode wrote (in a signed August 8, 2005
letter which I have since produced in court to blind eyes and deaf ears)
"... God controls all and in fact can allow circumstances to grant
you what you are seeking without an attorney." Immediately
suspecting improper influence by the White House, I wrote Mr. Rexrode
"You're awfully close to the White House. I wonder if
in more ways then your address." My
suspicions would be confirmed by a reporter for The Forward in December
2005 who, after telling me his investigation found "Rodney
Rexrode" does not exist and that The Forgiveness Foundation was the
brain child of then White House Chief of staff Andrew Card. - wrote
"There is little direct evidence to support Bronshtein's claims
that Auto's high court ambitions colored his decisions - although the
claim showed prescience if nothing else coming four months before Alito
was named on October 31." Failing to mention The Forward hired an
appellate expert to review the record, including my pro-se pleadings,
which were filed in the aftermath of Alito's opinion, their story
continues "But there is considerable support for Bronshtein's
broader claims. Legal scholars say his conviction was flawed by
blatantly incorrect rulings from the bench." Card's
attempted improper influence isn't the only thing the Forward's almost
entirely inaccurate and shamelessly misleading sham of a story covered
up and/or misrepresented. Record
evidence', which The Forward was able to confirm, will prove Alito's
opinion is not only a politically motivated affront to justice - where he
blatantly misrepresented the law, and the already badly tainted and
previously misrepresented record facts, and evidence, in order to come
to his absurd and credibility challenged conclusions - But where even
more dishonorably as a favor to his good long time friend Patrick O'Connor, he
misrepresented the
panels on the record findings and brazenly covered up Cozen O’Conner’s admitted malpractice. Which was found and questioned during
the April 22, 2003 oral arguments by Judge Stapleton. Who clearly found
"tremendous prejudice was suffered by the admission of other crimes
evidence" and that Cozen O'Connor attorneys were ineffective for
failing to raise this meritorious issue on "Federal Constitutional
Grounds" Before the attorney making oral argument (Louis Natalie)
assured the panel I couldn't get back in on this meritorious issue, or
on Cozen O'Connor's admitted ineffectiveness, if the panel decided to
shoot me down. Clear
and convincing evidence will prove Alito's opinion was not only
influenced by his impending nomination to high court which, as I would
learn through Cozen O'Connor Senior partner and counsel of record Peter
Rossi in 2002, was already promised Alito at least as early as 2002,
but by his good long time friend Patrick O'Connor. Who, having had
absolutely no prior involvement with my case whatsoever, entered his
appearance as counsel for oral arguments to obviously improperly
influence the panel to cover up his firms obvious malpractice. And the
following facts, all of which were confirmed by The Forward, will
support that conclusion. Documented
evidence which l shared with The Forward will prove Peter Rossi told me
about Alito's promised nomination in 2002 while attempting to talk me
into dropping my appeals as a favor to him in exchange for a life
sentence. Patrick
O’Connor’s appearance for oral arguments would be kept
secret from me to this
day if I didn't discover it on my own upon hearing the April 22, 2003
oral arguments audio-tape; more then 2 years after the fact after being
fought all of that time first by Peter Rossi then by Judge Alito. My
correspondence with Peter Rossi will prove I began questioning his
malpractice in the weeks leading up to oral arguments. There
is substantial evidence of actual innocence in the Horn matter which, as
evidence of Cozen O'Connor's much broader and obvious malpractice, they
never raised. Instead they misrepresented me in a conflict of interest
with my former attorneys who I almost had to die to get rid of in 1999
before Peter Rossi brought them back in as ghost writers shortly
thereafter. As death penalty opponents these attorneys only goal was to
get me a new sentencing hearing rather than attacking the
unconstitutionality of my wrongful convictions. Both of which, as the
record will clearly reflect, were obtained in Kangaroo courts who, after
going off the record in more than two dozen sidebars and chamber
meetings when things weren't looking so good for the Commonwealth, among
other egregious acts, accepted as credible the flagrantly obvious
perjury and fabrication of evidence by detectives who, along with
prosecutors fabricated and manufactured evidence; threatened and coached
witnesses to lie; to make false identifications; and others, who could
have helped exonerate me to
disappear - while deliberately withholding material exculpatory"
and impeaching evidence which could have easily established the same/
but more importantly, my innocence. All of which is supported by the
record and could be found thoroughly explained in my pro-se pleadings to
the Third Circuit which were filed between April 28, 2005 and June 13,
2005 - in the aftermath of Auto's opinion. My
pleadings which total approximately 150 pages not only attack Alito's
opinion as the politically motivated affront to justice it truly is, but
the unconstitutionality of my conviction. Moreover, they are very
detailed with regard to Counsels malpractice - all of which was admitted
during an April 22, 2005 visit by Peter Rossi. Who while sabotaging me
behind the scenes continued to
pretend to be my friend, before I was left with no other choice but to
plead my own case on a 7th grade education; which is the last grade I graduate before
dropping out of school to become a professionally trained jeweler by age
15. Even
though the most serious allegations against Mr. Rossi and his firm were
made in court filings by June 13, 2005 - none of which they've denied -
he
would wait until May 10, 2006 to ask the court to dismiss him of his
duties since, according to his letter neither he nor his firm could
effectively continue to represent me due to those allegations.
Incredibly neither he nor his firm felt that way while they continued to
misrepresent me after Judge Alito denied my June 13, 2005 motion to
dismiss them which was filed immediately upon discovering why they
fought so hard to keep me from hearing the April 22, 2003 oral arguments
audio-tape. Several
guards from SCI-Greene will swear that on June 9, 2005
they were
arbitrarily ordered to deny me possession of and access
to said audio-tape
which I not only had to
petition the court
several times to
receive but had authorization to keep. Between
Alito's nomination and his confirmation dozens of letters were sent to
senate democrats and to the media. To this day I haven't received a
single response or inquiry even though I made clear I was open to any
and all. Material
and documented evidence will prove a doctored oral arguments audio-tape
was produced sometime after June 13, 2005 which I received and was
allowed to keep in May 2006 after creating a long paper trail in which
prison officials are contradicting themselves and each other as well as Cozen O'Connor attorneys regarding the original. After
I warned Alito of going public in May 2005, several attorneys who
expressed a serious interest to take my case were never heard from again
after I spoke of them on the telephone. On
May 16, 2006, in response to Peter Rossi's May 10, 2006 letter, the Court
of Common Pleas in On
May 26, 2006, during what was supposed to be a status hearing Mr. Hills
unethically called my competency into question. The next day The
Norristown Times Herald had me claiming "The White House and
Supreme Court Justices Set Me up" - a claim so outrageous it had to
be scripted by those who would like to discredit me by slandering me.
Another hearing was held on June 20, 2006 which, to the discontent of
the Judge, allowed me the opportunity to get what I needed to get on the
record. On
October 5, Not
a single question was asked during any one of these 3 hearings. The
transcripts, as well as the reporting
by The Times Herald, which was the only media there all three times, will reveal a blatant political cover up. I
was held at the I
don't know when they plan on transferring me to Waymart to begin
drugging me against my will. But I fear if I don’t
get help soon this perfectly sane and competent man - perhaps too
competent for my own good - will soon be turned into an incompetent, or
worse - with the White House obviously using their influence to silence
me, and those who would help me, God only knows what that could be. Finally,
to add even more insult on top of already grievous and near grave
injury, after being informed of these matters in a letter dated November
27, 2006, the Governor's office of Chief Counsel advised me to forward
any future correspondence regarding this matter to my counsel in a
letter dated December 15,2006 and signed by the Governor's Chief Counsel
Albert H. Masland. And
now after nearly 16 years of having only myself to rely on I'm relying on my fellow prisoners to get this out to the right
attorney, politician, and/or media organization. With a little help from
God, I remain hopeful someone will emerge with the necessary courage to
do the right thing, and with that I pray.
Sincerely, Antuan T. Bronshtein
|