Will you help Tony Medina live another day?

 

Click on the links below to navigate this page

- The Crime
- The likely Perpetrator
- The Trial
- Tony´s defense
- The witnesses of the defense
- Evidence of Tony Medina`s innocence
- Contact/Help

 

The Crime

At approximately 2:30 am on January 1, 1996 a passenger in a dark coloured 4-door car opened fire with a AK-47 rifle into a group of people partying in front of a house on Campden Hill in South West Houston. Nine year old David Rodriguez and his sister fifteen year old Diane Rodriguez died.

On January 12th, 1996 Tony Medina was indicted for capital murder based on testimony of gang members (including Dominic Holmes who first was suspected being the shooter and whose charge has been dropped after he said: “It was not me, but Tony.”). On August 01st, 1996 Tony Medina was sentenced to die by lethal injection.

top

 

The Likely Perpetrator

Dominic Holmes

At Tony’s trial, Mr Holmes admitted a being passenger in the car as the drive-by shooting occurred.

But he said that Tony was the shooter. Evidence indicated that Tony Medina never left the party where he was with friends and therefore was not in the car.

The state withheld critical evidence. This proof would have shown that Mr Holmes had a motive to lie and would have destroyed his credibility.

On January 10th, 1996 Mr. Holmes was seen by police driving a stolen Suburban suspected of being used in a robbery. Mr. Holmes fled from police, crashing the vehicle then trying to escape on foot. Police further noted that Mr. Holmes had 11 prior arrests in the previous 3 years. Moreover, despite the State's assurance that no deals were given to any of their witnesses, the notes of the Magistrate Mr. Holmes was taken in front of prove this is untrue. According to the notes, Mr. Holmes was assured by police "that if he told them what happened they would probably help him out and see what they could do for him". Moreover, it was VERY CLEAR from the Magistrate's warning that Mr. Holmes was being charged with Capital Murder. Charges that were dropped after he told the police what they wanted to hear.

top

 

The Trial

Tony Medina had been in trouble before; in fact Tony had just spent over 11 months incarcerated for a previous crime. Tony Medina had plead guilty to and accepted responsibility for his actions and received probation… it was because of this, along with his former affiliation with a gang, that caused the Houston Police to target him.

Tony Medina took the stand in his own defense. He testified that he had not been associating with the gang for some time, yet because he wanted to celebrate New Years and car problems prevented him for using his or his sister`s car, he decided to celebrate and ride to some parties with friends who were still active in the gang and his cousin Alex. Tony told the jury that after buying beer and picking up another friend just a little after midnight he returned to his friend Canderlario`s party stayed until 3 am and that his cousin was with him at all times. He stated that he remained behind with his cousin and several friends at the party when Moore and Holmes drove off a little after 2 am and was there when they returned around 3 am. Tony testified that right at or a little after 3 am they were all asked to leave and that he got into the rear of a truck belonging to the girlfriend of his friend Thomas along with his cousin Alex and Johnny Valdez. Alex ended up dropping Tony and another friend off at his house. Tony Medina denied any participation in the crime, telling the jury he did not even know of the drive-by until the next day when his sister pointed it out on the news. Tony’s cousin Alex also took the stand and testified that neither he nor Tony Medina left the party with Moore and Holmes at any time.

There was a simple test to determine the approximate ejection pattern of the spent casings from the murder weapon that could have EASILY proved the state`s 3 main witnesses; Moore, Holmes and Valdez were lying. The state’s firearm examiner, Robert Baldwin, who has been at the centre of Houston’s police lab scandal for the gross negligence of his work, agreed to do the test, but the D.A. objected to having the gun missing during one days worth of testimony and the judge refused to order the test done. Instead he said Mr. Baldwin would have to do the test on his own and that would have to be over the weekend. But for a reason never explained to Tony, his trial attorneys dropped the matter, despite the tests ability to show that the crime could NOT HAVE HAPPENED as the state`s witnesses claim it did.

top

 

Tony´s Defense

Tony’s defense at trial could be considered less then minimal at best. Instead of the minimum of 300 hours of investigation needed to prepare for a capital murder trial, Tony’s investigator only logged 30 hours of work on his case, according to their own records. The defense put on 2 witnesses who testified that Holmes confessed and bragged about committing the drive-by shooting, yet because of the lack of investigation by Tony’s defense, they failed to find and interview at least 6 other witnesses who were later found by Tony’s appeal lawyers to have substantial information which could have proved TONY MEDINA WAS INNOCENT. The defense`s entire presentation only lasted 4 ½ hours before they rested. The jury then took almost 10 hours to bring a guilty verdict on July 29, 1996 – 5 days after the state began presenting evidence.

On July 30, 1996 Tony was back in court, this time to see if he would live or be sentenced to death. During the punishment phase, the defense counsel is responsible for thoroughly investigating his clients background and the state`s case, then presenting witnesses on his clients behalf. The defenses presentation for this part of Tony`s trial consisted of only 7 witnesses and lasted a mere one hour and five minutes, helping seal Tony`s fate. The fact is, Tony`s attorneys DID NOT EVEN INVESTIGATE his background and were completely unprepared for his defense. The witnesses who did testify were those his father was able to contact that day. They took the stand without ever being questioned or prepared by Tony`s defense.

Despite all of the help the state had from Tony`s lawyers not doing their jobs, it still took the jury over 13 hours to make a decision. On August 1, 1996, with his parents standing less then 10 feet away, Tony Medina was sentenced to die by lethal injection for a crime he did not commit.

top

 

The Witnesses of the Defense

The state alleges there were 7 people in the car when the crime occurred. Three people testified they were in the car at the time of the drive-by shooting. James Moore identified himself as the owner and driver of the vehicle, while his cousin Dominic Holmes and Holme`s best friend Johnny Valdez were passengers. All 3 testified they did not know the drive-by was going to happen and that Tony Medina committed the crime…. THIS IS ALL THEY AGREED ON.

The states whole case against Tony rested on these alleged witnesses. Moore, Holmes and Valdez together gave a total of at least 11 different and contradicting statements. They NEVER, even at trial agreed on;

  1. who was sitting where in the car at the time of the crime
  2. who was even IN the car
  3. where they were coming from or going to when the crime was committed
  4. or what time the crime actually occurred

For example, Mr. Moore claims that he had no knowledge that gun was even in his car, even though the rifle was close to 45 inches long. Yet, Valdez testified that Moore stopped the car around the corner from the house the drive by occurred at so that Tony could retrieve the gun from Mr. Moore`s trunk and switch seats, into the front. While Holmes stated that Tony Medina was ALWAYS in the front seat with the gun in his possession.

The states other star witness was Leon Guy… Mr. Guy was in the neighbour's drive way when the crime took place. He gave a statement at the time saying that he witnessed a white or mexican hand holding a gun out the window of a dark colored 4-door car. He testified that he could not remember other facts too well because he was “DEAD DRUNK”. The fact is Mr. Guy said at Tony Medina`s trial that he was only positive about four things.

  1. that he saw a white or mexican hand
  2. that the gun WAS NOT an AK-47
  3. that the car was a 2- door LIGHT GRAY model
  4. that his memory was better then, at Tony`s trial 6 months after the night in question, then it was the night of the drive-by because he was DEAD DRUNK that night.

Regina Juarez testified for the state that Tony Medina returned to the party and told her that he had done the shooting. From the statements of the innocence-witnesses - who did not testify in court - it becomes apparent later that Juarez and Holmes had agreed to blame the crime on Tony Medina.

The Witnesses of the Defense

The defense put on two witnesses: Domingo Valle and Rene Reyna, who testified that Dominic Holmes had confessed to committing the drive-by-shooting.

Alex Perez told the jury that Tony Medina hadn´t left the party with Holmes and Valdez.

top

 

Evidence of Tony Medina`s innocence

These are the Testimonies of witnesses that could have proved Tony Medina`s innocence, but were heard at trial because the D.A. withheld critical evidence and Tony’s Defence Attorney was incompetent. 

Mr. Nacoste

On January 10th,1996 the police visited Mr. Nacoste at his school and told him they were investigating a Capital Murder that occurred on New Year's Eve. When Mr. Nacoste informed the police that he did not know anything about the shooting, they responded that his name had been mentioned by others and that an eyewitness described the shooter as a black male. The police told Mr. Nacoste they would drop an assault charge he had against him if he cooperated, so he told them he was at Mr. Guerrero's party that night when Mr. Holmes showed up with another black male. Mr. Nacoste said that when Mr. Holmes arrived "he was all pumped up" and explained that he had driven by the home of a rival gang member's girl friend, and saw the gang member outside. Mr.Holmes began asking for the "AK", and told people at the party he was going to "roll by" looking for the gang member and "start busting at them". Mr. Holmes asked Mr. Nacoste, who was higher up in their gang, for permission to do a drive-by. Mr. Holmes later told Mr. Nacoste he had "messed up" and that he wasn't sure how many people he had hit but he "did see 2 or 3 fall". Mr. Nacoste was told by Mr. Holmes that if anyone asked he should say Tony Medina was the shooter. According to Mr. Holmes, Tony was already "known" by the police and would be a good person to blame. Plus, Mr. Holmes was upset that Tony had got away from the gang life. Despite all this information, Mr. Nacoste was never contacted by Tony`s lawyers, even after they were told he had important information.

Mr. McNickles and Ms. Hamilton

Mr. McNickles lived in the neighbourhood only a few blocks away from the house where the shooting happened. On New Year's Eve he was talking on the phone to a friend when he saw 2 black males driving a dark colored 4-door car in front of his home, with the black male in the passenger seat shooting a rifle into the air. Mr. McNickles statements are supported by his friend Ms. Hamilton. Ms. Hamilton recalls that as she spoke to Mr. McNickles on the phone on New Year's Eve, she heard the sound of gunfire and asked him what happened. Ms. Hamilton remembers him telling her that "two niggers in a dark car" were shooting a rifle in the air. Despite the importance of what Mr. Mcnickles and Ms. Hamilton witnessed, the jury was never to hear their testimony. No defense investigator or lawyer ever went out to the area where the shooting occurred to knock on doors and ask if anyone had information that could help Tony’s case.

Mr. Crawford

Mr. Crawford lived in the same neighbourhood as James Moore and went to high school with Mr. Holmes. Mr. Crawford knew how mad Mr. Holmes was over the killing of his friend and fellow gang member, and recalls Mr. Holmes frequently talking about wanting to "do something" to members of the rival gang that were responsible. Shortly after New Year's Eve, Mr. Crawford was at Mr Moore's sister's apartment when Mr. Holmes brought a "long rifle wrapped in a towel", and recalls Mr. Moore being concerned about having the gun around him because he was still on parole. Mr. Crawford, like Mr. Nacoste, Mr. McNickles, and Ms. Hamilton, was never contacted by Tony`s lawyers or investigators prior to trial.

Mr. Villanueva

Mr.Villanueva was a fellow gang member of Mr.Holmes. In early January 1996 while talking to a common friend on the phone he was told that some guys in LRZ, LARAZA 13, had done a drive-by. During the same conversation he was able to talk to Mr. Holmes who was at the friends house. Mr. Holmes bragged to him about committing the murders, starting “that shit was cool”. Mr. Villanueva could have provided a direct link between Mr. Holmes and the drive-by, but because of Tony`s lawyers, his information was never heard by the jury.

Mr. Becerra

Mr. Becerra, who was a leader in the LRZ gang also had information about Tony`s case, but was never contacted by the defense. Mr. Becerra remembers Mr. Holmes expressing interest in earning his "stripes" and also trying to get his cousin Mr. Moore involved in LRZ. While Tony was incarcerated in 1995, Mr.Becerra recalls Mr. Holmes was trying to take control of Tony`s "branch" of the gang and making it clear he wanted to replace Tony in the gang, since Tony announced he was "stepping down" and leaving the gang life. Mr.Becerra was out of town on New Year's Eve but returned to Houston on January 2nd, 1996. Upon returning he noticed more police in the neighborhood than normal and called his girlfriend to find out what was going on. Mr. Becerra's girlfriend told him that Mr. Holmes and his cousin Mr. Moore had done a drive-by using Mr. Moores car, so it would not be recognized. When Mr. Becerra went to his girlfriend`s house later he found her upset and crying. She told him Mr. Holmes and his cousin had been by there earlier and had threatened to "fuck up her world" if she told on them. Mr. Becerra also talked with Mr. Holmes later when they were incarcerated together. When Mr. Becerra asked Mr. Holmes why he was threatening his girlfriend, Mr. Holmes told him that he was not "going down for this", that he had "put in some work" on the rival gang and that now "them hoe ass cops were just fucking" with him. Mr. Becerra was then told by Mr. Holmes that he planned to blame the drive-by on Tony Medina.

All these testimonies were filed by Tony Medina`s Lawyers in Tony´s Habeas Corpus appeal in November 2001. As for right now Tony Medina has not got an answer whether he will get a new trial and if this time all the evidence will be heard.

top

 

Contact / Help

If you would like to help please contact Diana Srowig and Simone Oberenzer at: anthonymedina@alive-gegen-todesstrafe.de

Webpage: www.tonymedina.de

Or:

Tony Medina #999204 
Polunsky Unit 
3872 FM 350 South
Livingston, TX. 77351
U.S.A

Donations can be made to:

Deutsche Bank Bocholt
ALIVE e.V.
Konto: 3100088
BLZ: 428 700 24
Keyword: Anthony Medina

Don't forget the Keyword please!

International Account for Donations from EU-States:

Deutsche Bank 24 Bocholt
ALIVE e.V.
IBAN: DE44 4287 0024 0310 0088 00
BIC DEUTDEDB428
Keyword: Anthony Medina

 

Visit Tony's profile

top

 

Back to Home